Main Research Areas
Our research interests
lie in the area of communication and information theory for wireless
networks, signal processing, optimization and machine learning for
wireless communications, wireless sensing and wireless power, and
prototyping of wireless systems.
Signal Design and
Processing for
Wireless Power Transfer
Far-field Wireless Power Transfer (WPT) has attracted significant
attention in recent years. Despite the rapid progress, the emphasis of
the research community in the last decade has
remained largely concentrated on improving the design of energy
harvester (so-called rectenna) and has left aside the effect of
transmitter design. We study the design of signals dedicated for WPT so
as to enhance the range of WPT and the dc power
at the output of the rectenna. Topics include energy harvester
modeling, energy beamforming for WPT, channel acquisition, power region
characterization in multi-user WPT, waveform design with linear and
non-linear energy receiver model, safety and health issues of WPT,
massive MIMO.
• B. Clerckx
and E.
Bayguzina, “Waveform
Design for Wireless Power Transfer”, IEEE Trans on
Sig Proc, Vol. 64, No. 23, pp. 6313-6328, Dec 2016.
• Y. Zeng, B. Clerckx and R. Zhang, “Communications
and Signals Design
for Wireless Power Transmission” IEEE Trans. on Comm, invited
paper, Vol 65, No 5, pp 2264 – 2290, May 2017.
• B. Clerckx and E. Bayguzina, “A
Low-Complexity Adaptive Multisine Waveform Design for Wireless Power
Transfer,” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol 16,
pp 2207 – 2210, 2017.
• Y. Huang and B. Clerckx, “Large-Scale
Multi-Antenna Multi-Sine Wireless Power Transfer”, IEEE Trans. on
Sig Proc., vol. 65, no. 21, pp 5812-5827, Nov 2017.
• Y. Huang and B. Clerckx, “Waveform
Design for Wireless Power Transfer with Limited Feedback” IEEE
Trans. on Wireless Commun., vol 17, no 1, pp 415 – 429, Jan. 2018.
• B. Clerckx, A. Costanzo, A. Georgiadis, and N.B. Carvalho, “Toward 1G
Mobile Power Networks: RF, Signal, and System Designs to Make Smart
Objects Autonomous” IEEE Microwave Magazine, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 69
– 82, Sept./Oct. 2018.
• B. Clerckx and J. Kim, “On the Beneficial Roles of
Fading and Transmit Diversity in Wireless Power Transfer with Nonlinear
Energy Harvesting,” IEEE Trans. on Wireless Commun, vol. 17, no.
11, pp. 7731 – 7743, Nov. 2018.
• S. Shen and B. Clerckx, “Beamforming
Optimization for MIMO Wireless Power Transfer with Nonlinear Energy
Harvesting: RF Combining versus DC Combining,” IEEE Trans. on
Wireless
Comm., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 199-213, Jan. 2021.
• S. Shen and B. Clerckx,
“Joint
Waveform and Beamforming Optimization for MIMO Wireless Power
Transfer,” accepted to IEEE Trans. on Commun.
Prototyping and
Experimentation of Wireless Power and Radio Systems
We develop and experiment
the first prototype of a closed-loop WPT architecture based on channel
adaptive waveform optimization and dynamic channel acquisition. The
prototype consists of three important blocks as channel estimator,
waveform optimizer, and energy harvester. Software Defined Radio (SDR)
prototyping tools are used to implement a wireless power transmitter
and a channel estimator, and a voltage doubler rectenna is designed to
work as an energy harvester. We conduct experiments in real-world
over-the-air conditions and highlight the benefits of such closed-loop
and adaptive architecture over the traditional open-loop non-adaptive
design. We have also extended the prototype to demonstrate the
feasibility of wireless information and power transfer.
• J. Kim, B. Clerckx, and
P.D. Mitcheson, “Prototyping
and Experimentation of a Closed-Loop Wireless Power Transmission with
Channel Acquisition and Waveform Optimization” IEEE WPTC 2017.
• B. Clerckx and J. Kim, “On the Beneficial Roles of
Fading and Transmit Diversity in Wireless Power Transfer with Nonlinear
Energy Harvesting,” IEEE Trans. on Wireless Commun, vol. 17, no.
11, pp. 7731 – 7743, Nov. 2018.
• J. Kim, B. Clerckx, and P.D. Mitcheson, “Experimental
Analysis of Harvested Energy and Throughput Trade-off in a Realistic
SWIPT System,” IEEE WPTC 2019.
• J. Kim, B. Clerckx, and P.D.
Mitcheson “Signal and
System Design for Wireless Power Transfer:
Prototype, Experiment and Validation” IEEE Trans. on Wireless
Comm.,
vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 7453-7469, Nov. 2020.
• S. Shen, J. Kim, C. Song,
and B. Clerckx, “Wireless
Power Transfer with Distributed Antennas:
System Design, Prototype, and Experiments,” accepted to IEEE Trans.
on
Industrial Electronics.
• J. Kim and B. Clerckx, “Range
Expansion for
Wireless Power Transfer using Joint Beamforming and Waveform
Architecture: An Experimental Study in Indoor Environment,”
accepted to
IEEE Wireless Commun. Letters.
• J. Kim and B. Clerckx, “Wireless
Information and Power Transfer for IoT: Pulse Position Modulation,
Integrated Receiver, and Experimental Validation,” submitted to
IEEE
Internet of Things Journal.
Wireless Information and Power Transfer/Wireless Powered Communication Network
Radio waves carry both
energy and information. Nevertheless, traditionally, energy and
information have been treated separately and have evolved as two
independent fields in academia and industry, namely wireless power and
wireless communication, respectively. This separation has for
consequences that 1) current wireless networks pump RF energy into the
free space (for communication purposes) but do not make use of it for
energizing devices and 2) providing ubiquitous mobile power would
require the deployment of a separate network of dedicated energy
transmitters. Imagine instead a wireless network where information and
energy flow together through the wireless medium. Wireless
communication, or Wireless Information Transfer (WIT), and WPT would
refer to two extreme strategies respectively targeting
communication-only and power-only. A unified Wireless Information and
Power Transfer (WIPT) design would have the ability to softly evolve in
between those two extremes to make the best use of the RF
spectrum/radiations and network infrastructure to communicate and
energize, and hence outperform traditional systems relying on a
separation of communications and power.
• J.
Park and B. Clerckx, “Joint Wireless
Information and Energy Transfer in a Two-User
MIMO Interference Channel,” IEEE Trans. On Wireless Comm.,
vol. 12, no.
8, pp. 4210-4221, Aug. 2013.
• J. Park and B. Clerckx, “Joint Wireless
Information and
Energy Transfer
in a K-User MIMO
Interference Channel,” IEEE Trans. On Wireless Comm, vol. 13,
no. 10,
pp. 5781-5796,
Oct 2014.
• H. Son and B. Clerckx, “Joint Beamforming
Design for Multi-User
Wireless Information and
Power Transfer,” IEEE Trans. On Wireless Comm., vol. 13, no.
11, pp.
6397-6409, Nov
2014.
• J. Park and B. Clerckx, “Joint wireless
information and energy transfer
with reduced
feedback in MIMO interference channels,” IEEE Journal on
Selected Areas
in
Commun., vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 1563-1577, Aug 2015.
• Y. Huang and B. Clerckx, “Joint Wireless
Information and Power
Transfer for an
Autonomous Multiple-Antenna Relay System,” IEEE Comm.
Letters, vol.19,
no.7,
pp.1113-1116, July 2015.
• H. Lee, K.-J. Lee, H. Kim, B. Clerckx, and I. Lee, “Resource Allocation Techniques for Wireless Powered
Communication Networks with Energy Storage Constraint,” IEEE
Transactions on Wireless Communications, Vol.15 No.4, pp.2619-2628,
April 2016.
• Y. Huang and B. Clerckx, “Relaying
Strategies for Wireless-Powered
MIMO Relay Networks” IEEE Trans. on Wireless Comm, vol 15, no 9, pp
6033-6047, Sept 2016.
• B. Clerckx, Z. Bayani Zawawi and K. Huang “Wirelessly
Powered Backscatter Communications: Waveform Design and SNR-Energy
Tradeoff” IEEE Communication Letters, vol 21, no 10, pp 2234-2237,
Oct 2017.
• B. Clerckx, “Wireless
Information and Power Transfer: Nonlinearity, Waveform Design and
Rate-Energy Tradeoff”, IEEE Trans. on Sig Proc, vol 66, no 4, pp
847-862, Feb 2018.
• J. Park, B. Clerckx, C. Song and Y. Wu, “An Analysis of the
Optimum Node Density for Simultaneous Wireless Information and Power
Transfer in Ad Hoc Networks” IEEE Trans. on Veh. Techn., vol. 67,
no. 3, pp. 2713-2726, Mar. 2018.
• Z. B. Zawawi, Y. Huang and B. Clerckx, “Multiuser Wirelessly
Powered Backscatter Communications: Nonlinearity, Waveform Design and
SINR-Energy Tradeoff,” IEEE Trans. on Wireless Commun, vol. 18, no.
1, pp. 241 – 253, Jan 2019.
• M. Varasteh, B. Rassouli, and B. Clerckx, “On Capacity-Achieving
Distributions for Complex AWGN Channels under Nonlinear Power
Constraints and their Applications to SWIPT,” IEEE Trans. on Inf.
Theory, vol. 66, no. 10, pp. 6488-6508, Oct. 2020.
• B. Clerckx, R. Zhang, R. Schober,
D. W. K. Ng, D. I. Kim, and H. V. Poor, “Fundamentals of Wireless
Information and Power Transfer: From RF Energy Harvester Models to
Signal and System Designs,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in
Communications, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 4-33, Jan 2019.
• Z. B. Zawawi, Y. Huang and B. Clerckx, “Multiuser Wirelessly
Powered Backscatter Communications: Nonlinearity, Waveform Design and
SINR-Energy Tradeoff,” IEEE Trans. on Wireless Commun, vol. 18, no.
1, pp. 241 – 253, Jan 2019.
• M. Varasteh, B. Rassouli, and B. Clerckx, “SWIPT
Signalling over Frequency-Selective Channels with a Nonlinear Energy
Harvester: Non-Zero Mean and Asymmetric Inputs” IEEE Trans. on
Commun., vol. 67, no. 10, pp. 7195-7210, Oct 2019.
• E.
Bayguzina and B. Clerckx, “Asymmetric
Modulation Design for Wireless
Information and Power Transfer with Nonlinear Energy Harvesting,”
IEEE Trans. on Wireless Comm., vol 18, no 12, Dec 2019.
• B. Clerckx, K.
Huang, L. R. Varshney, S. Ulukus, and M.-S. Alouini, “Wireless
Power
Transfer for Future Networks: Signal Processing, Machine Learning,
Computing, and Sensing,” submitted to IEEE Journal of Selected
Topics
in Signal Processing.
Machine Learning for
Wireless Communications and Power Transfer
We study the use of
machine learning, as an alternative and complementary approach to
communication theory and optimization, to design wireless
communications and wireless power transfer systems.
• M. Varasteh, E. Piovano
and B. Clerckx, “A Learning Approach to
Wireless Information and Power Transfer Signal and System Design,”
IEEE ICASSP 2019.
• M. Varasteh, B. Clerckx and J. Hoydis, "Learning
Modulation Design
for
SWIPT with Nonlinear Energy Harvester: Large and Small Signal Power
Regimes," IEEE SPAWC 2019.
• M. Varasteh, B. Clerckx and J. Hoydis, "Learning
to Communicate and Energize: Modulation, Coding and Multiple Access
Designs for Wireless Information-Power Transmission," IEEE Trans.
on Commun., vol. 68, no. 11, pp. 6822-6839, Nov. 2020.
Information/Communication-Theoretic
Limits of MIMO
Wireless Networks
We study the fundamental
limits of Robust Interference Management for MIMO wireless networks. A
particular interest is the
characterization of rate/DoF/Generalized DoF region of networks with
imperfect and/or
delayed Channel State Information at the Transmitter (CSIT) and the
role played by CSIT on the performance of MIMO wireless networks.
• B. Rassouli, C. Hao and
B. Clerckx, “A
New Proof for the
DoF Region of the MIMO Networks with No CSIT,” IEEE Comm.
Letters, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 763–766, May 2015.
• B. Clerckx and D. Gesbert, “Space-Time Encoded
MISO Broadcast Channel
with Outdated CSIT: An Error Rate and Diversity Performance Analysis,”
IEEE Trans. On Comm., vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 1661–1675, May 2015.
• B. Rassouli, C. Hao and B. Clerckx, “DoF Analysis
of the MIMO
Broadcast Channel with Alternating/Hybrid CSIT,” IEEE Trans. on
Info
Theory, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 1312-1325, March 2016.
• C. Hao and B. Clerckx, “Achievable Sum
DoF of the K-User MIMO Interference Channel with Delayed CSIT,”
IEEE Trans. on Comm, vol 64, no 10, pp. 4165-4180, Oct 2016.
• B. Rassouli and B. Clerckx, "On the Capacity
of Vector Gaussian
Channels With Bounded Inputs," IEEE Trans. on Info Theory, Vol 62,
No
12, pp 6884-6903, Dec 2016.
• C. Hao and B. Clerckx,
“MISO Networks
with Imperfect CSIT: A Topological Rate-Splitting
Approach,” IEEE Trans. on Comm., Vol 65, No 5, pp. 2164 – 2179, May
2017.
• C. Hao, B. Rassouli, and B. Clerckx, “Achievable
DoF Regions of MIMO Networks with Imperfect CSIT,” IEEE Trans. on
Info Theory, vol. 63, no. 10, pp. 6587-6606, Oct 2017.
• E. Piovano and B. Clerckx, “Optimal DoF region of the
K-User MISO BC with Partial CSIT,” IEEE Commun. Letters, vol 21, no
11, pp 2368-2371, Nov 2017.
• E. Piovano, H. Joudeh, and B. Clerckx “Generalized Degrees of
Freedom of the Symmetric Cache-Aided MISO Broadcast Channel with
Partial CSIT,” IEEE Trans. on Inf. Theory, vol. 65, no. 9, pp.
5799-5815, Sept 2019.
• H. Joudeh and B. Clerckx, “On the Optimality of
Treating Inter-Cell Interference as Noise in Uplink Cellular Networks,”
IEEE Trans. on Inf. Theory, vol. 65, no. 11, pp. 7208-7232, Nov 2019.
• H. Joudeh and B. Clerckx, “On the
Separability of Parallel MISO Broadcast Channels under Partial CSIT: A
Degrees of Freedom Region Perspective,” IEEE Trans. on Inf. Theory,
vol. 66, no. 7, pp. 4513-4529, July 2020.
Rate-Splitting Multiple Access
and Next Generation Multiple Access
Rate Splitting Multiple Access (RSMA), based on (linearly or nonlinearly) precoded Rate-Splitting (RS) at the transmitter and Successive Interference Cancellation (SIC) at the receivers, has emerged as a novel, general and powerful framework for the design and optimization of non-orthogonal transmission, multiple access, and interference management strategies in future MIMO wireless networks. RSMA relies on the split of messages and the non-orthogonal transmission of common messages decoded by multiple users, and private messages decoded by their corresponding users. This enables RSMA to softly bridge and therefore reconcile the two extreme strategies of fully decode interference and treat interference as noise. RSMA has been shown to generalize, and subsume as special cases, four seemingly different strategies, namely Space Division Multiple Access (SDMA) based on linear precoding (currently used in 5G), Orthogonal Multiple Access (OMA), Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access (NOMA) based on linearly precoded superposition coding with SIC, and physical-layer multicasting. RSMA boils down to those strategies in some specific conditions, but outperforms them all in general. Through information and communication theoretic analysis, RSMA is shown to be optimal (from a Degrees-of-Freedom region perspective) in a number of scenarios and provides significant room for spectral efficiency, energy efficiency, fairness, reliability, QoS enhancements in a wide range of network loads and user deployments, robustness against imperfect Channel State Information at the Transmitter (CSIT), as well as feedback overhead and complexity reduction over conventional strategies used in 5G. The benefits of RSMA have been demonstrated in a wide range of scenarios (MU-MIMO, massive MIMO, multi-cell MIMO/CoMP, overloaded systems, NOMA, multigroup multicasting, mmwave communications, communications in the presence of RF impairments and superimposed unicast and multicast transmission, relay,…) and systems (terrestrial, cellular, satellite, …). Thanks to its versatility, RSMA has the potential to tackle challenges of modern communication systems and is a gold mine of research problems for academia and industry, spanning fundamental limits, optimization, PHY and MAC layers, and standardization..
We are leading the Special Interest Group (SIG) on RSMA in IEEE Communications Society. Check the link for a detailed list of papers and tutorials. In this SIG on RSMA, we provide a platform to bring together PhD students, researchers and engineers in academia and industry interested in the lower layers of wireless communication systems and in particular the design of 6G physical layer to share their ideas and discuss the major technical challenges, recent breakthroughs, new applications, open problems and challenges related to RSMA.
• C. Hao, Y. Wu and B.
Clerckx, “Rate Analysis of
Two-Receiver MISO
Broadcast
Channel with Finite Rate Feedback: A Rate-Splitting Approach,”
IEEE
Trans. on
Comm., vol. 63, no. 9, pp. 3232-3246, Sept 2015.
• B. Clerckx, H. Joudeh, C. Hao, M. Dai, and B. Rassouli, “Rate Splitting
for MIMO Wireless Networks: A Promising PHY-Layer Strategy for LTE
Evolution,” IEEE Comm. Mag, pp 98-105, May 2016.
• M. Dai, B. Clerckx, D. Gesbert and G. Caire, “A Rate Splitting Strategy for Massive MIMO with
Imperfect CSIT,” IEEE Trans. on Wireless Comm., vol 15, no 7, pp
4611-4624, July 2016.
• H. Joudeh and B. Clerckx, “Sum-Rate Maximization for Linearly
Precoded Downlink Multiuser MISO Systems with Partial CSIT: A
Rate-Splitting Approach,” IEEE Trans. on Comm. vol. 64, no. 11, pp.
4847-4861, Nov 2016.
• H. Joudeh and B. Clerckx “Robust Transmission in Downlink Multiuser
MISO Systems: A Rate-Splitting Approach,” IEEE Trans. on Sig. Proc.
Vol. 64, No. 23, pp. 6227-6242 , Dec 2016.
• C. Hao and B. Clerckx,
“MISO Networks
with Imperfect CSIT: A Topological Rate-Splitting
Approach,” IEEE Trans. on Comm., Vol 65, No 5, pp. 2164 – 2179, May
2017.
• A. Papazafeiropoulos, B. Clerckx, and T. Ratnarajah, “Rate-Splitting
to Mitigate Residual Transceiver Hardware Impairments in Massive MIMO
Systems,” IEEE Trans. on Veh. Tech., vol 66, no 9, pp 8196-8211,
Sept 2017.
• C. Hao, B. Rassouli, and B. Clerckx, “Achievable
DoF Regions of MIMO Networks with Imperfect CSIT,” IEEE Trans. on
Info Theory, vol. 63, no. 10, pp. 6587-6606, Oct 2017.
• E. Piovano and B. Clerckx, “Optimal DoF region of the
K-User MISO BC with Partial CSIT,” IEEE Commun. Letters, vol 21, no
11, pp 2368-2371, Nov 2017.
• M. Dai and B. Clerckx, “Multiuser
Millimeter Wave Beamforming Strategies with Quantized and Statistical
CSIT,” IEEE Trans. on Wireless Comm., vol 16, no 11, pp 7025-7038,
Nov 2017.
• H. Joudeh and B. Clerckx, “Rate-Splitting
for Max-Min Fair Multigroup Multicast Beamforming in Overloaded Systems”,
IEEE Trans. on Wireless Commun., vol 16, no 11, pp 7276-7289, Nov 2017.
• Y. Mao, B. Clerckx and V.O.K. Li, “Rate-Splitting
Multiple Access for Downlink Communication Systems: Bridging,
Generalizing and Outperforming SDMA and NOMA,” EURASIP Journal on
Wireless Communications and Networking, May 2018.
• Y. Mao, B. Clerckx and V.O.K. Li, “Rate-Splitting for
Multi-Antenna Non-Orthogonal Unicast and Multicast Transmission:
Spectral and Energy Efficiency Analysis,” IEEE Trans. on Commun.,
vol 67, no 12, pp. 8754-8770, Dec 2019.
• J. Zhang, B. Clerckx, J. Ge, and Y. Mao, “Cooperative
Rate-Splitting for MISO Broadcast Channel with User Relaying, and
Performance Benefits over Cooperative NOMA,” IEEE Signal Processing
Letters, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 1678-1682, Nov 2019.
• B. Clerckx, Y. Mao, R. Schober, and H. V. Poor, “Rate-Splitting
Unifying SDMA, OMA, NOMA, and Multicasting in MISO Broadcast Channel: A
Simple Two-User Rate Analysis,” IEEE Wireless Communications
Letters, vol. 9, no 3, March 2020.
• Y. Mao, B. Clerckx, J. Zhang, V.O.K.
Li, and M. Arafah, “Max-min
Fairness of K-user Cooperative Rate-Splitting in MISO Broadcast Channel
with User Relaying” IEEE Trans. on Wireless Comm., col. 19, no. 10,
pp. 6362-6376, Oct. 2020.
• Y. Mao and B. Clerckx, “Beyond
Dirty Paper Coding for Multi-Antenna Broadcast Channel with Partial
CSIT: A Rate-Splitting Approach,” IEEE Trans. on Commun., vol 68,
no. 11, pp. 6775-6791, Nov. 2020.
• Y. Mao,
E. Piovano, and B. Clerckx, “Rate-Splitting
Multiple Access for Overloaded Cellular Internet of Things,”
accepted to IEEE Trans. on Commun.
• O. Dizdar, Y. Mao, W. Han, and B.
Clerckx, “Rate-Splitting
Multiple Access for Downlink Multi-Antenna Communications: Physical
Layer Design and Link-level Simulations”, IEEE PIMRC 2020.
• O. Dizdar, Y. Mao, B. Clerckx, “Rate-Splitting
Multiple Access to Mitigate the Curse of Mobility in (Massive) MIMO
Networks” submitted to IEEE Trans. on Commun.
• B. Clerckx, Y. Mao,
R. Schober, E. Jorswieck, D.J. Love, J. Yuan, L. Hanzo, G.Y. Li, E.G.
Larsson, and G. Caire, “Is NOMA
Efficient in Multi-Antenna Networks? A Critical Look at Next Generation
Multiple Access Techniques,” submitted to IEEE Open Journal of the
Communications Society.
6G
We study 6G multiple access designs.
• O. Dizdar, Y. Mao, W.
Han, and B. Clerckx, “Rate-Splitting
Multiple Access: A New Frontier for the PHY Layer of 6G”, IEEE VTC
Fall 2020.
• O. Dizdar, Y. Mao, Y. Xu, P. Zhu, and B. Clerckx,
“Rate-Splitting Multiple Access for Enhanced URLLC and eMBB in 6G,” in
IEEE ISWCS 2021.
Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces/Intelligent Reflecting Surfaces
We study the modeling,
design and optimization of reconfigurable intelligent surfaces for next
generation wireless communications and wireless power transfer.
• S. Shen, B. Clerckx,
and R. Murch, “Modeling
and Architecture Design of Intelligent Reflecting Surfaces using
Scattering Parameter Network Analysis,” submitted to IEEE Trans. on
Wireless Commun.
• Y. Zhao, B. Clerckx, and Z. Feng, “IRS-Aided SWIPT: Joint Waveform,
Active and Passive Beamforming Design Under Nonlinear Harvester Model,”
in submission
• Z. Feng, B. Clerckx, and Y. Zhao, “Waveform
and
Beamforming Design for Intelligent Reflecting Surface Aided Wireless
Power Transfer: Single-User and Multi-User Solutions,” in
submission
Integrated Radar Sensing and Communications
We study the integration
of sensing and communications in future wireless networks and aim at
understanding how to make the best use of the spectrum joint sensing
and communications.
• C. Xu, B. Clerckx, and
J.
Zhang, “Multi-Antenna Joint Radar and Communications: Precoder
Optimization and Weighted Sum-Rate vs Probing Power Tradeoff,” IEEE
Access, vol. 8, pp. 173974-173982, 2020.
• C. Xu, B. Clerckx, S. Chen, Y.
Mao, and J. Zhang, “Rate-Splitting
Multiple Access for Multi-Antenna Joint Radar and Communications,”
in submission
• O. Dizdar, A. Kaushik, B. Clerckx, C. Masouros, “Rate-Splitting
Multiple Access for Joint Radar-Communications with Low-Resolution DACs,”
IEEE ICC 2021.
• R. Cerna-Loli, O. Dizdar, and B. Clerckx “A
Rate-Splitting Strategy to Enable Joint Radar Sensing and Communication
with Partial CSIT,” submitted to IEEE SPAWC 2021.
Satellite Communications
We study multi-antenna
processing, multiple access, and interference maangement for future
multibeam satellite communications.
• L. Yin and B. Clerckx, “Rate-Splitting
Multiple Access for Multigroup Multicast and Multibeam Satellite Systems,”
IEEE Trans. on Commun., vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 976-990, Feb. 2021.
• Z. W.
Si, L. Yin, and B. Clerckx, “Rate-Splitting
Multiple Access for Multigateway Multibeam Satellite Systems with
Feeder Link Interference” in submission
• L. Yin, O. Dizdar, and B.
Clerckx, “Rate-Splitting
Multiple Access for Multigroup Multicast Cellular and Satellite
Communications: PHY Layer Design and Link-Level Simulations” IEEE
ICC 2021.
Some Matlab Codes
Matlab Code for Capacity of Vector Gaussian Channels With Bounded Inputs• Matlab code for the paper B. Rassouli and B. Clerckx, "On the Capacity of Vector Gaussian Channels With Bounded Inputs," IEEE Trans. on Info Theory, Vol 62, No 12, pp 6884-6903, Dec 2016.
Matlab Codes for rate-splitting• Matlab code for
the paper Y. Mao, B. Clerckx and V.O.K. Li, “Rate-Splitting
Multiple Access for Downlink Communication Systems: Bridging,
Generalizing and Outperforming SDMA and NOMA,” EURASIP Journal on
Wireless Communications and Networking, May 2018.
• Matlab code for the paper Y. Mao, B.
Clerckx and V.O.K. Li, “Energy Efficiency of
Rate-Splitting Multiple Access, and Performance Benefits over SDMA and
NOMA” IEEE ISWCS 2018.
• Matlab code for the paper Y. Mao, B.
Clerckx and V.O.K. Li, “Rate-Splitting for
Multi-Antenna Non-Orthogonal Unicast and Multicast Transmission”
IEEE SPAWC 2018.
• Matlab code for
the paper E. Piovano, H. Joudeh and B. Clerckx, “Overloaded
MU-MISO
transmission with imperfect CSIT,” Asilomar 2016.